Construction of Pipeline not Major Federal Action under NEPA

The D.C. District Court issued a decision in Sierra Club v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers on November 13, 2013, denying the plaintiff Sierra Club's request to stop the construction of the privately owned Flanagan South oil pipeline by Enbridge. Sierr… Read More
Read More
Categories: NEPA

2014 Update to the CEQA Guidelines

As discussed in an earlier article, SB 743 implemented needed CEQA reforms for “Transit Priority Projects” and directed OPR to establish new criteria for analyzing transportation impacts through amendments to the CEQA Guidelines. However,… Read More
Read More
Categories: CEQA

SB 743: Changes for "Transit Priority Projects" & Transportation Impact Analysis under CEQA

While many in the development community were hopeful that 2013 would be a year of major CEQA reforms, in the end the state made more modest revisions to the law. Led by Senate President pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, the Legislature passed and the Govern… Read More
Read More
Categories: CEQA

Mining Update: Legislature Proposes Protecting Mining Operations from Nuisance Impediments

The California Legislature is considering an amendment to Assembly Bill 1161 to insulate surface mining operations against nuisance liability. The amendment would prevent any “mining activity, operation, or facility, or appurtenance thereof,… Read More
Read More
Categories: SMARA

Senate Bill 834 Proposes CEQA Exemption for Existing Manufacturing Facility Operations

California Senate Republican Leader Bob Huff, R-Diamond Bar, introduced new urgency legislation relating to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). Senate Bill 834 proposes to add section 21080.38 to the Public Resources Code e… Read More
Read More
Categories: Articles

Department of Conservation Interim Well Stimulation Treatment Regulations (SB 4) Effective January 1, 2014

On January 1, 2014 SB 4 took effect along with interim regulations over well stimulation treatment undertaken by oil and gas operators. SB 4 requires operators to obtain a permit from the Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources (“DOGGR… Read More
Read More
Categories: Articles

Clean Water Act Citizen-Suit Alleging "New Source" Violations Must Comply with 60-Day Waiting Period

Black Warrior Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Black Warrior Minerals, Inc. (2013) 734 F.3d 1297 The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeal recently decided whether a citizen can bypass the 60-day waiting period under the Clean Water Act (“CWA”) by allegin… Read More
Read More
Categories: Articles

Court Holds that NPDES Shield Applies to Quarry Operator Discharging under Mine Permit

Wisconsin Resources Protection Council v. Flambeau Mining Company 727 F.3d 700 The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeal recently held that a mining operation did not violate the Clean Water Act when it discharged pollutants without a NPDES permit, based o… Read More
Read More
Categories: Articles

US EPA and US Army Corps of Engineers Continue Their Efforts to Clarify Clean Water Act Jurisdiction

Rapanos v. U.S. 547 U.S. 715 The United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”) jointly submitted a draft rule to clarify the limits of Clean Water Act (“CWA”)… Read More
Read More
Categories: Articles

Court Clarifies the Mitigation Fee Act, Expanding Relief under Its Protest Provisions

The California Supreme Court has recently clarified language in the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code § 66000, et. seq.), which allows developers to pay development "fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions" under protest, while simul… Read More
Read More
Categories: Articles